Homelessness is no fun. There is a ministry called the Free Store in downtown Charlotte for homeless people. It provides some of their basic necessities for free. Our church has voted this as a ministry to support.
It has not been easy for me to be involved there. It brings back memories of a different life, in a different place and a different situation. For many months in the early 70s I experienced what those people experience. Homelessness is no fun. It has been difficult for me to be at the free store...emotional...maybe even frightening because I have been in partial denial for 30+ years. Like with my fear of heights I find myself just wanting to jump...right back there with them. I have become like most people who have never experienced it. Thankful for the way life is and really uncomfortable being around those other people. But at the same time I find myself drawn to help those people whom Jesus died for. They are just like you and me. They just exist on the other side of the tracks...the side most are embarrassed about.
Please don't be embarrassed. Give them the compassion every human deserves through Christ. "However, there should be no poor among you..." Deuteronomy 15:4 NIV
Monday, April 11, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Human Sexuality Class Involves Demonstration
Attendance was optional, but about 100 students stayed after class to watch. This story appeared in the Charlotte Observer, Thursday, March 3, 2011. It comes out of Chicago at Northwestern University. After Prof. John Bailey’s human sexuality class, a demonstration occurred which was optional but which included sex act performed in front of the audience. After the class a couple demonstrated the use of the sex toy and female orgasm. Of course the professor gave five or six warnings stating that this was going to be graphic but hardly anybody left. The woman undressed and got on stage with her male partner who used a device to give her an orgasm.
One would call this live pornography by two exhibitionists, the same kind that work in topless bars and are strippers. Perhaps the best one could say about it is that it is obscene.
Here is a good opportunity for all the preachers in America to harangue Northwestern University for its graphic and flagrant acceptance of the sinless and godless culture of today. They might, but this preacher is not going to. It doesn't accomplish anything positive anyway.
I see something else here. I see a lack of acceptance and understanding of who we are as humans. Question: Are we a distinct creature or simply a higher form of animal? In my high school, I learned that humans are mammals...animals. But that is not what God says.
When God created mankind he used a different method than he did for all other inorganic or organic creation. Genesis 2:7, The Lord God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. (NIV) Everything else God simply spoke into existence. But with mankind he used his hands, it was personal and he made us in his own image. (Genesis 1:27)
I ask again: Who are we? Are we a unique creature unlike any other in the world or are we simply mammals and as such we should act like animals; creatures who act on instinct, who are more concerned about themselves than anyone else, who are seemingly controlled by pleasure or other feelings, and brute or physical force and cunning are the predominant survival techniques.
I submit that most of societal problems can be traced back to this; Violence, inhumanity inflicted upon humans, war, abuse, anything that devalues one over another; one lion fighting another over territory or a mate or… God help us all if that's what we believe. Because that does not involve morality, what is considered a good character, neither a spiritual dimension in life. The spiritual dimension is perhaps the most important that sets us apart from all other creatures and connects us with God, our maker, our ultimate lover and our Savior. Without that we are animals and might as well act like it…hay, Northwestern is teaching it.
One would call this live pornography by two exhibitionists, the same kind that work in topless bars and are strippers. Perhaps the best one could say about it is that it is obscene.
Here is a good opportunity for all the preachers in America to harangue Northwestern University for its graphic and flagrant acceptance of the sinless and godless culture of today. They might, but this preacher is not going to. It doesn't accomplish anything positive anyway.
I see something else here. I see a lack of acceptance and understanding of who we are as humans. Question: Are we a distinct creature or simply a higher form of animal? In my high school, I learned that humans are mammals...animals. But that is not what God says.
When God created mankind he used a different method than he did for all other inorganic or organic creation. Genesis 2:7, The Lord God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. (NIV) Everything else God simply spoke into existence. But with mankind he used his hands, it was personal and he made us in his own image. (Genesis 1:27)
I ask again: Who are we? Are we a unique creature unlike any other in the world or are we simply mammals and as such we should act like animals; creatures who act on instinct, who are more concerned about themselves than anyone else, who are seemingly controlled by pleasure or other feelings, and brute or physical force and cunning are the predominant survival techniques.
I submit that most of societal problems can be traced back to this; Violence, inhumanity inflicted upon humans, war, abuse, anything that devalues one over another; one lion fighting another over territory or a mate or… God help us all if that's what we believe. Because that does not involve morality, what is considered a good character, neither a spiritual dimension in life. The spiritual dimension is perhaps the most important that sets us apart from all other creatures and connects us with God, our maker, our ultimate lover and our Savior. Without that we are animals and might as well act like it…hay, Northwestern is teaching it.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
End of Civility and Christianity?
I thought I would share something I just read in Best Practices, a newsletter for pastors: “Pastor Jared Wright went to hear Ted Wilson, (president of the General Conference) speak in Redlands, CA last week. Afterward, Pastor Jared approached a man who'd asked Wilson a question during the Q&A that Jared wanted to clarify. He introduced himself and told the man he was writing an article for Spectrum magazine. At the word "Spectrum" the man went into a rage, and after threatening to take him outside and beat him up, settled for punching him in the mouth - right in the church sanctuary…
“Perhaps I’m nostalgic, but it seems to me that our capacity for courteous discourse has diminished. We seem less able to disagree without being disagreeable. And is it any wonder? Sometime said to me recently that the church follows the culture, and we're all aware that respect and civility are hard to find in public conversations… So should we be surprised that the rhetoric of violence - not to mention actual violence - filters into the church, too?” (Loren Seibold, Editor, Best Practices)
Not only that, but as I looked at different responses to this altercation on Facebook, I discovered that many “liberals” who were outraged by the violence would be very happy to see the perpetrator receive equal through arrest or law suit. Is that any better? Does joining a “conservative” or “liberal” mindset ensure that one will be Christlike? No! Only Christ within can assure Christlikeness.
Those whose goal is to purify the church from sinful people, philosophies, and permissive practices as well as those who want to silence the above mentioned people, should never resort to violent measures. “Love is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.” (1Corinthians 13:5) “Do not repay evil for evil.” (Romans 12:17) “Do not be overcome by evil but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:21) In their zeal defending the church from such influence, they forget that people are more important then a perceived church health. In God’s eyes people are of infinite worth, those who are led astray and those who lead us astray. Jesus gave His life for all. Just ask the question, can you see Jesus punching someone in the face for speaking out…for any reason? Not the Jesus I see in Scripture.
“Perhaps I’m nostalgic, but it seems to me that our capacity for courteous discourse has diminished. We seem less able to disagree without being disagreeable. And is it any wonder? Sometime said to me recently that the church follows the culture, and we're all aware that respect and civility are hard to find in public conversations… So should we be surprised that the rhetoric of violence - not to mention actual violence - filters into the church, too?” (Loren Seibold, Editor, Best Practices)
Not only that, but as I looked at different responses to this altercation on Facebook, I discovered that many “liberals” who were outraged by the violence would be very happy to see the perpetrator receive equal through arrest or law suit. Is that any better? Does joining a “conservative” or “liberal” mindset ensure that one will be Christlike? No! Only Christ within can assure Christlikeness.
Those whose goal is to purify the church from sinful people, philosophies, and permissive practices as well as those who want to silence the above mentioned people, should never resort to violent measures. “Love is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.” (1Corinthians 13:5) “Do not repay evil for evil.” (Romans 12:17) “Do not be overcome by evil but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:21) In their zeal defending the church from such influence, they forget that people are more important then a perceived church health. In God’s eyes people are of infinite worth, those who are led astray and those who lead us astray. Jesus gave His life for all. Just ask the question, can you see Jesus punching someone in the face for speaking out…for any reason? Not the Jesus I see in Scripture.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Gay Chaplain helps police
Charlotte, NC, Nov 2010
I read the front page of the Charlotte Observer on Saturday morning, Nov 6 of this year and I noticed a story entitled: “6 volunteer police chaplains resign.” The story went on to explain that there were 15 volunteer chaplains from area churches who helped the police department in traumatic situations. Recently the police department added another chaplain, a lady who is gay, though very qualified to be a chaplain. Immediately six of the chaplains resigned.
I realize that not all chaplains are of Christian foundation, there may be some who are Jewish, some Moslem or other persuasions. But the term "chaplain" does refer to a religious practitioner. At least some of those chaplains were of Christian persuasion. I find it difficult to understand why they could not associate with a professional person who is gay. The article went on to say that some police serving Charlotte are gay.
Putting all politics and sociology aside, if one boils down in simple form what Christianity means, it means those who are followers of Jesus. Certainly the example of Jesus was to associate with sinners. (Luke 5:30) The worst we can say about gay people is that they are sinners...like the rest of us. (Rom 3:23) I may have a different flavor of sin in my life but it is sin, nonetheless.
If I am not really a follower of Jesus, but simply one who practices the American, popular, culture of Christianity then I might not associate with gay people. But I believe in following Jesus, first and last. I believe Jesus would have stayed serving the police department and its clients and associating openly with gay people and anyone else who needs his compassion and service, benefiting from his example.
I read the front page of the Charlotte Observer on Saturday morning, Nov 6 of this year and I noticed a story entitled: “6 volunteer police chaplains resign.” The story went on to explain that there were 15 volunteer chaplains from area churches who helped the police department in traumatic situations. Recently the police department added another chaplain, a lady who is gay, though very qualified to be a chaplain. Immediately six of the chaplains resigned.
I realize that not all chaplains are of Christian foundation, there may be some who are Jewish, some Moslem or other persuasions. But the term "chaplain" does refer to a religious practitioner. At least some of those chaplains were of Christian persuasion. I find it difficult to understand why they could not associate with a professional person who is gay. The article went on to say that some police serving Charlotte are gay.
Putting all politics and sociology aside, if one boils down in simple form what Christianity means, it means those who are followers of Jesus. Certainly the example of Jesus was to associate with sinners. (Luke 5:30) The worst we can say about gay people is that they are sinners...like the rest of us. (Rom 3:23) I may have a different flavor of sin in my life but it is sin, nonetheless.
If I am not really a follower of Jesus, but simply one who practices the American, popular, culture of Christianity then I might not associate with gay people. But I believe in following Jesus, first and last. I believe Jesus would have stayed serving the police department and its clients and associating openly with gay people and anyone else who needs his compassion and service, benefiting from his example.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Halloween...not so bad
Halloween in history is the last day of the ancient Celtic calendar, October 31. Druids gathered to protect themselves from the souls that were passing from the bodies of animals looking for one more chance to have a human body. (Ruth Kelley, The Book of Halloween, p.10) Early Christian leaders tried to replace this pagan feast with All Saints' Day to commemorate the saints who have died. It became a Christian memorial day. But that has not caught on with too many Christians.
Is there anything wrong or unbiblical about celebrating a Christian Memorial Day to remember those "saints" from our church that have died. Their loved ones haven't forgotten them. And we as a church might do well to remember their love, their example, and the nobleness in their characters. If you read Hebrews 11 you have a fine example recounting the experience of those who have died. Maybe there is some¬thing biblical here.
There are some who feel that because a belief or practice is of unfavorable origin, it should automatically be discarded or condemned today? Although the science of astronomy developed from astrology, we don't ignore the importance and the value of astronomy. Even more to the point, some of the months of the year and days of the week are named after Roman gods, but we haven't abandoned the calendar or changed those names. And even though the practice of saying "God bless you" when some¬one sneezes comes from superstition, we still do it. But then, consistency has not been the goal in many discussions.
Is there not logic in trying to replace and change rather then just eliminate a non-Christian celebration? Since we do live in the world, (John 17:15) our society makes it very hard to just ignore these things. It makes good sense to replace a bad practice with a good one. Too often the church restricts people from certain activities, even if it is for their own good, but does not give positive answers or fill in the hole that is left. This principle to bring balance when something bad is taken from the life was taught by Jesus in Matt 12:43-45. When we eliminate practices from people’s lives we have a responsibility to replace those with something good.
No, I don’t encourage you to be a “ghoulish” person scaring people this time of year. But neither do I judge those who wish to join in harmless fun or even remember our family "saints" who have passed.
Is there anything wrong or unbiblical about celebrating a Christian Memorial Day to remember those "saints" from our church that have died. Their loved ones haven't forgotten them. And we as a church might do well to remember their love, their example, and the nobleness in their characters. If you read Hebrews 11 you have a fine example recounting the experience of those who have died. Maybe there is some¬thing biblical here.
There are some who feel that because a belief or practice is of unfavorable origin, it should automatically be discarded or condemned today? Although the science of astronomy developed from astrology, we don't ignore the importance and the value of astronomy. Even more to the point, some of the months of the year and days of the week are named after Roman gods, but we haven't abandoned the calendar or changed those names. And even though the practice of saying "God bless you" when some¬one sneezes comes from superstition, we still do it. But then, consistency has not been the goal in many discussions.
Is there not logic in trying to replace and change rather then just eliminate a non-Christian celebration? Since we do live in the world, (John 17:15) our society makes it very hard to just ignore these things. It makes good sense to replace a bad practice with a good one. Too often the church restricts people from certain activities, even if it is for their own good, but does not give positive answers or fill in the hole that is left. This principle to bring balance when something bad is taken from the life was taught by Jesus in Matt 12:43-45. When we eliminate practices from people’s lives we have a responsibility to replace those with something good.
No, I don’t encourage you to be a “ghoulish” person scaring people this time of year. But neither do I judge those who wish to join in harmless fun or even remember our family "saints" who have passed.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Isaiah 58 and the Sabbath
Not having been raised in the Adventist church but attending various evangelistic meetings in the early 70s I soon learned Isaiah 58 was a very important text in understanding and keeping the Sabbath day. The evangelist would read verse 12 and explained that the mission of this church was that God was calling it to repair the breach in the wall of truth which included bringing back the seventh day Sabbath to the world. Verses 13 and 14 explained the principle of how to keep it.
Before we get around to verses 12 - 14 I think we should look at verses 1 - 11 and discover the context of this chapter. It is quite surprising what the emphasis of this chapter is and how that leads us into verse 12. The emphasis is on caring for your neighbor especially the disenfranchised and the poor. The humility and fasting that God wants is to loose the chains of injustice (Verse 6), set the oppressed free and break every yoke. Share your food with the hungry and provide the poor wanderer with shelter -- when you see the naked, to clothe him, and not turn away from your own family. (V.7) Stop pointing the finger and talking maliciously but spend yourselves on behalf of the hungry and satisfy the needs of the oppressed (Vs 9,10.
This is the context before you get to verse 12. Rebuilding the ancient ruins and raising up on the foundations; becoming a repair of the broken walls and restores of streets begins with treating one another compassionately, especially the poor. The emphasis in verse 12 finds its strength in verses 1-11. After that we could talk about keeping the Sabbath and careful way. In fact, doing things for the poor and the disenfranchised is an appropriate way to keep Sabbath even if it causes you to sweat.
Verse 13: If you keep your foot- This clearly refers to traveling on the Sabbath. And back in those days to travel 5 or 10 miles was work. Today we can fly from one coast to the next in little more time than it took them to walk 10 miles. But in major traveling I prefer not to do it on the Sabbath.
From doing your own pleasure or as you please… call the Sabbath a delight- I have often had difficulty with these two phrases. In one sense you are not supposed to have pleasure, in another sense you are. Make up your mind. Right here is where I discovered Adventist’s keeping of the Sabbath differs from the way the Jews and perhaps even the Bible teaches us to keep it.
With all of the Jewish laws recorded in the Mishnah with detailed and technical rules about what you could and could not do on the Sabbath, there were no rules that restricted fun, pleasure and play. The Jews put quite a bit of emphasis on having a good time on Sabbath. They had free reign on play with no restrictions. My wife and I visited a Synagogue in Jerusalem one Friday night. Though I was not allowed to take notes during the service, the children continuously ran up and down the aisles playing. None of the adults seemed to care. This would never happen in American churches. I assume it had something to do with the way the Jewish people regard the Sabbath. They want everyone to have fun, even in the service.
Even in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve were created on the sixth day. Jesus married them. The first Sabbath experienced together was right after their wedding. So, what do you think Friday night was? A honeymoon of course. Where do we get this idea that pleasure is somehow evil and sinful? It doesn't come from God. But it does come as a carryover from the medieval church and even Puritan, Victorian America. I discovered that when I looked at some of the faces of Adventists on the Sabbath they believed a false interpretation of Isaiah 58. When I saw them the rest of the week they looked happy.
What is Isaiah referring to when he says we should not do our own pleasure? The word pleasure here actually refers to business. We should not carry on our business of gainful employment.
Problems in our accepted practice: If you have ever spent much time around Adventist institutions like universities, hospitals, etc. you will discover that the way those institutions keep the Sabbath is very different than the way 90% of Adventists do. Just walk around on the campus of these institutions and you will discover that they have their own security patrolling the grounds day and night, workers in the cafeteria, cleaning floors, operating the power plant, running the laboratory, and numerous other tasks. When we hold Sabbath convocations in public buildings, we higher people to perform various necessary functions and we expect to be served in restaurants where we eat. There seems to be a feeling that if you're working for an Adventist institution you are exempt from keeping the Sabbath in the same way that people who live outside are. If we were to go to a restaurant in Charlotte and an Adventist served us we would think he was breaking the Sabbath. Are we being ethical?
Let's face it, if we really want to be strict about keeping the Sabbath we will go out to our breaker box on Friday before sundown and turn off the main power supply to our house as well as close the water tap into the house and not even flush the toilet. Because we are making somebody have to work so that we have those conveniences. It can really get complicated to keep the Sabbath strictly today in 21st century America and be consistent when your goal is somewhat legalistic.
We all have different ways that we keep the Sabbath. We all have settled in our own mind what we think is approved and what we think isn’t. One should not judge another. “You then, why do you judge your brother?” (Romans 14:10)
The bottom line, 3 things: 1- Spiritual day 2-Physical rest 3-Family. In fact, the Sabbath is a date with God where we spend time together without interruptions.
Before we get around to verses 12 - 14 I think we should look at verses 1 - 11 and discover the context of this chapter. It is quite surprising what the emphasis of this chapter is and how that leads us into verse 12. The emphasis is on caring for your neighbor especially the disenfranchised and the poor. The humility and fasting that God wants is to loose the chains of injustice (Verse 6), set the oppressed free and break every yoke. Share your food with the hungry and provide the poor wanderer with shelter -- when you see the naked, to clothe him, and not turn away from your own family. (V.7) Stop pointing the finger and talking maliciously but spend yourselves on behalf of the hungry and satisfy the needs of the oppressed (Vs 9,10.
This is the context before you get to verse 12. Rebuilding the ancient ruins and raising up on the foundations; becoming a repair of the broken walls and restores of streets begins with treating one another compassionately, especially the poor. The emphasis in verse 12 finds its strength in verses 1-11. After that we could talk about keeping the Sabbath and careful way. In fact, doing things for the poor and the disenfranchised is an appropriate way to keep Sabbath even if it causes you to sweat.
Verse 13: If you keep your foot- This clearly refers to traveling on the Sabbath. And back in those days to travel 5 or 10 miles was work. Today we can fly from one coast to the next in little more time than it took them to walk 10 miles. But in major traveling I prefer not to do it on the Sabbath.
From doing your own pleasure or as you please… call the Sabbath a delight- I have often had difficulty with these two phrases. In one sense you are not supposed to have pleasure, in another sense you are. Make up your mind. Right here is where I discovered Adventist’s keeping of the Sabbath differs from the way the Jews and perhaps even the Bible teaches us to keep it.
With all of the Jewish laws recorded in the Mishnah with detailed and technical rules about what you could and could not do on the Sabbath, there were no rules that restricted fun, pleasure and play. The Jews put quite a bit of emphasis on having a good time on Sabbath. They had free reign on play with no restrictions. My wife and I visited a Synagogue in Jerusalem one Friday night. Though I was not allowed to take notes during the service, the children continuously ran up and down the aisles playing. None of the adults seemed to care. This would never happen in American churches. I assume it had something to do with the way the Jewish people regard the Sabbath. They want everyone to have fun, even in the service.
Even in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve were created on the sixth day. Jesus married them. The first Sabbath experienced together was right after their wedding. So, what do you think Friday night was? A honeymoon of course. Where do we get this idea that pleasure is somehow evil and sinful? It doesn't come from God. But it does come as a carryover from the medieval church and even Puritan, Victorian America. I discovered that when I looked at some of the faces of Adventists on the Sabbath they believed a false interpretation of Isaiah 58. When I saw them the rest of the week they looked happy.
What is Isaiah referring to when he says we should not do our own pleasure? The word pleasure here actually refers to business. We should not carry on our business of gainful employment.
Problems in our accepted practice: If you have ever spent much time around Adventist institutions like universities, hospitals, etc. you will discover that the way those institutions keep the Sabbath is very different than the way 90% of Adventists do. Just walk around on the campus of these institutions and you will discover that they have their own security patrolling the grounds day and night, workers in the cafeteria, cleaning floors, operating the power plant, running the laboratory, and numerous other tasks. When we hold Sabbath convocations in public buildings, we higher people to perform various necessary functions and we expect to be served in restaurants where we eat. There seems to be a feeling that if you're working for an Adventist institution you are exempt from keeping the Sabbath in the same way that people who live outside are. If we were to go to a restaurant in Charlotte and an Adventist served us we would think he was breaking the Sabbath. Are we being ethical?
Let's face it, if we really want to be strict about keeping the Sabbath we will go out to our breaker box on Friday before sundown and turn off the main power supply to our house as well as close the water tap into the house and not even flush the toilet. Because we are making somebody have to work so that we have those conveniences. It can really get complicated to keep the Sabbath strictly today in 21st century America and be consistent when your goal is somewhat legalistic.
We all have different ways that we keep the Sabbath. We all have settled in our own mind what we think is approved and what we think isn’t. One should not judge another. “You then, why do you judge your brother?” (Romans 14:10)
The bottom line, 3 things: 1- Spiritual day 2-Physical rest 3-Family. In fact, the Sabbath is a date with God where we spend time together without interruptions.
Friday, May 21, 2010
The Limit of Rational Thought
I read a book once, "Jesus-The Revolutionary". It wasn't about a wild man; it was about a meek and lowly carpenter, but with a message that turned the world upside down. When God ordained the Christian church, a revolution started and is still going on today.
Since Jesus ascended to heaven, the Holy Spirit carries on this revolution.
Something has happened in the Adventist Church. We like rational thought, reason, and logic, things that we can put very carefully in a well defined box or system of belief. That way we will always stay in the protecting walls and nothing sneaks out or in. We are afraid to go outside the box; it’s safe in here. Those who want to live outside the box are suspect.
Our pioneers weren’t like that. Ellen White was very open to the experience of God outside the known realm. She had numerous dreams and visions that were unexplainable by reason. Our church was built on truth and the special work of the Holy Spirit.
But something happened along the way. We shut down any and everything that doesn’t follow our well defined reason. We don't encourage dreams and visions any more. We suspect them all...so we ignore our own.
When I say Rational thought I mean clear, concrete laws, policies, boundaries that protect us from anything new that might hurt us. We hold onto what we know then ignore or demonize everything else.
Hence we don’t know what to do with the wind, otherwise called the Holy Spirit.
That’s not who I am. I am one of those people who longs to live outside the box...who doesn't sense he belongs in society. I sometimes get into trouble because of it, but I am happier there...because I think God is there.
Since Jesus ascended to heaven, the Holy Spirit carries on this revolution.
Something has happened in the Adventist Church. We like rational thought, reason, and logic, things that we can put very carefully in a well defined box or system of belief. That way we will always stay in the protecting walls and nothing sneaks out or in. We are afraid to go outside the box; it’s safe in here. Those who want to live outside the box are suspect.
Our pioneers weren’t like that. Ellen White was very open to the experience of God outside the known realm. She had numerous dreams and visions that were unexplainable by reason. Our church was built on truth and the special work of the Holy Spirit.
But something happened along the way. We shut down any and everything that doesn’t follow our well defined reason. We don't encourage dreams and visions any more. We suspect them all...so we ignore our own.
When I say Rational thought I mean clear, concrete laws, policies, boundaries that protect us from anything new that might hurt us. We hold onto what we know then ignore or demonize everything else.
Hence we don’t know what to do with the wind, otherwise called the Holy Spirit.
That’s not who I am. I am one of those people who longs to live outside the box...who doesn't sense he belongs in society. I sometimes get into trouble because of it, but I am happier there...because I think God is there.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
